Unveiling the Digital Persona: A Deep Dive into Each Supervisor D3 Candidates’ Website

By Cris Alarcon

Published on November 14, 2023

In the upcoming election, the race for El Dorado County Supervisor in District 3 has intensified as four candidates vie for the position, each with a unique vision and approach to governance. Let’s delve into the digital realm to compare and contrast these contenders by exploring their campaign websites.

1. Brian K. Veerkamp – briankveerkamp.com

Brian K. Veerkamp’s website presents a polished and professional image. The homepage is streamlined, offering a clear navigation structure. Visitors can easily find information about Veerkamp’s background, key issues, and endorsements. The site is visually appealing, with high-quality images and a responsive design that ensures accessibility across devices.

2. Lexi Boeger – lexi4supervisor.com

Lexi Boeger’s campaign website is marked by a vibrant and dynamic aesthetic. The homepage immediately captures attention with bold graphics and an engaging layout. The website provides comprehensive sections on her background, platform, and community engagement. It effectively integrates social media, fostering a sense of connectivity with voters.

3. Brian DeBerry – sites.google.com/view/vote-deberry/home?authuser=0

Brian DeBerry’s campaign opts for a Google Sites platform, offering a straightforward and information-centric design. While lacking some of the visual flair seen on other sites, it efficiently communicates DeBerry’s priorities, experience, and community involvement. The simplicity may appeal to voters seeking a no-nonsense approach.

4. Gary Martin – garymartin4district3-supervisor.com

Gary Martin’s website exudes a grassroots feel, emphasizing community engagement. The homepage features bold banners, showcasing Martin’s key policy areas. The site is content-rich, providing detailed insights into his background, endorsements, and specific initiatives. The inclusion of a blog section fosters ongoing dialogue with constituents.

Commonalities and Distinctions:

• Themes: Veerkamp and Boeger emphasize professionalism and visual appeal, while DeBerry and Martin adopt simpler, content-focused designs.
• Accessibility: Veerkamp and Horvath prioritize mobile responsiveness, ensuring seamless access for users on various devices.
• Content Depth: DeBerry’s Google Sites platform opts for concise content, whereas Martin’s website stands out for its comprehensive and detailed approach.
• Engagement: Boeger and Martin actively use social media integration, fostering direct engagement with voters beyond the website.

In the digital age, a candidate’s online presence can significantly influence voter perception. Each candidate’s website reflects their unique style and approach to communicating with constituents. As the election unfolds, voters are encouraged to explore these platforms to make informed decisions on the future leadership of their district.