Stracener Clarifies Questioned Claims

Stracener believes the more spin he puts out to the voter, the more dizzy the voter becomes. Well that’s not the case with this voter. Stracener needs to be taken to task on the misleading information espoused. He by passed the vetting process, receiving what amounts to a political repayment from the former Govener for being a loyal “Yes” man. Stracener claims he has not sought the support or endorsements of the local layers, Hmm, well he met with one of my lawyers seeking his support. The only way to explain that, is to admit he lies. As for the amount of cases he claims to have heard in Delinquency and Dependency, he claims over 2000 on the You Tube video posted on his own web site. the court documents I received indicate less that 700. Not even to a plural figure exceeding one thousand. Of the cases he tries to explain in the article a portion of those were heard by another judge. A little misleading? For his claims of appearing before the US Supreme Court. WOW, He makes big claims to victory here. A call to the Supreme Court reveals he has NEVER appeared before them. Fact is, the case he sites in the article was argued before the Court, However by a private firm hired by the State of California. Spin, or just another Lie? Voters don’t be fooled, Google Warren Stacener, Check You Tube, learn the facts before you vote. We don’t need a dis-honest judge. Chuck Holland